Feminism’s Effect on Dating, Marriage

*Note*: Of course feminism is not responsible for EVERYTHING wrong with marriage and society today. I am writing under the assumption that people who read this are fair minded individuals that respect opinions even if they disagree with them. This is how I see it. If you have a different opinion, thats fine with me, I have no problem with it.

If you talk to any sociologist, they will all agree that feminism is responsible for breaking up the traditional, stable family. Whether or not this was for the benefit of women is up for debate. I would argue that destroying families is worse than the grievances of women at the time.

Back then, there were virtually no divorces. Today, divorces are the norm. Statistically, women are the ones who initiate the divorce most of the time.

Back then, there was less of a chance that a woman would cheat. Women were faithful and gave themselves to their husbands. They actually could cook, unlike now days. I've never met a girl who could cook. So back then it made sense because women would actually stay with them.

Many feminists claim that they do allow men to pay for them on dates. Well, while most women who identify as feminist benefit from the equality and specific laws protecting women, they have not given up the custom that men should pay for them. So they keep the benefits of feminism, but don’t give up what is necessary for them to become truly equal.

There is less of a reason for a man to do all these things for women. Think about the dating process:

1. The man must approach the woman who he has never met. This takes courage and confidence. He must be completely over himself and willing to lower his value and self-esteem. Right off the bat, he is in the L column.

2. He must say the right things, and be interesting enough for her to give him the number. She could just use him for free drinks, who knows. If he is good enough to her pleasing, he may get the number.

(So far, she has contributed absolutely nothing. Standing there looking pretty does not count. And he must do the most in terms of contributing to the conversation, such as figuring out topics to talk about and what-not. She certainly is not going to do anything that would make her seem too interested. She will only help the conversation along, so she can further judge the man.)

3. He must call at the perfect time. If he calls to early, she'll think he's a stalker and tell all her friends that he is a "creepy" stalker weirdo.

(So far, she still has contributed nothing)

4. The date. He drives her around in his car, on his dime. He pays for movie tickets. He pays for dinner. All the while, he must be on his A game and say the right things. He can't be too boring and can't be too aggressive.

(She has contributed nothing. A stuck up, selfish woman might say something like "Well just my presence alone is enough." This is how some women think, I have heard them say it myself)

5. Sex, or a kiss. After all he did, he is still expected to initiate the kiss or sex. Of course, he must do this at the right time for HER and to HER liking. Its all about HER pleasure. If its sex, he is expected to have protection with him.

(This is where she finally contributes something. She sleeps with him. But does this mean she has actually matched what he sacrificed? No. In fact, this doesn't even count, because sex benefits both men and women. So she still hasn't done any independent thing on her part to contribute to this relationship. He has done over and above anything she did. At this point, the best she possibly did was help the conversation along or maybe help keep the talk interesting, throughout the date. That is still little in comparison to what he has done.)
What has the woman done through all of this? Look nice? That’s it. She may contribute to the conversation, but he is expected to lead the talk and do everything else.

So the whole dating system is rigged top to bottom and the advantage is almost all women, from the very start.

This is why feminists should shut up. This is why they are radicals. If you are a feminist in America today, you are selfish and ungrateful.

I try all the time to rationalize this. I try to figure out where men get their share of the pie. I try to see where women actually contribute something meaningful to the relationship. But the more I analyze it, the more I come to the same conclusion: the entire mating scene is rigged. Perhaps, as I've said above, back then it was worth it. Women didn't cheat or leave their husbands. Women cooked and cleaned and actually raised the children. But today, I have yet to meet a woman my age that could cook. Feminists have demonized housework. So basically, women have kept all the benefits of the sacrifices men had to make in order to be with them, and thrown away all of the contributions that they once had to do.

This is why feminism is bad for our society. I do not hate women or wish them harm. But I'll be damned if I have to bow down to this matriarchal society that beats down the male and wants to feminize everything.

Rape, The Wage Gap, and Domestic Violence

First of all, allow me to proclaim that I do not hate women. I will debunk all of the feminist's faulty arguments starting with rape.

My argument is that any modern feminist should be considered a radical. Feminism started off innocent enough, but at this point, women not only have equal rights but they have the advantage over men. Women are the majority in this country. Women go to college and graduate more than men. If women are being held back in any way, it is their fault.

Let's talk about rape. Of course more men rape women than vice-versa. This is for many reasons. One is, men are physically stronger than women. Men are also sexually attracted to women, so naturally their victims will be women. It is nearly impossible for a woman to rape a man. If women could, some women would. It has nothing to do with sexism, but rather our biology.

Next up, domestic violence. This also has nothing to do with sexism either. Again, men are stronger than women. Naturally they will beat them up if they lose their temper. And if you are one of those women who say men and women are equal, do me a favor and petition the government to get rid of domestic violence laws, which are there to protect women. If women could, they would beat the shit out of men as well. It has nothing to do with hatred of women. It is biology, which I have studied myself.

Another bullshit feminist argument is the "wage gap". This is a myth. There are no groups of men that sit around and figure out how to weed women out of jobs. According to www.ncpa.org/, women simply choose different lifestyles. Men are more productive. Men are more likely to respect deadlines. Men are more willing to take risks on jobs. According to the department of labor, over 90% of work-related deaths happen to men and men alone.

Women take more days off. Men work more hours for the same jobs. The point is that women simply do not work as hard as men and therefore do not get compensated for it. These are the reasons for a wage gap. It is not sexism or misogyny. Women are responsible for this mess, and if they want to clean it up, they will have to do it themselves.

Christian Hatred in America Today

In this country, religion bashing has become the norm in the media and Hollywood. Whether it’s a biased news story or a jab by a lowly comedian such as Sarah Silvercunt, religion is constantly sneered at and looked down upon by elitist liberals.


However, what is meant by “religion bashing”? Are these people bashing random religions for humor? The answer is no. Religious bashing in America seems to only include Christianity. Jesus is the constant butt of every joke and Bible believing Christians are ostracized daily by the likes of Bill Maher, Larry David, and Sarah Silvercunt. (Sarah Silvercunt, the comedian that relies on her Jewish heritage to garner laughs. Sarah Silvercunt, the lanky woman with no body to speak of.)


What is this fascination with Christianity? Why not Islam? Why not bash Hindus? It is well known that this country was founded upon Judaea-Christian values. Christianity can be observed everywhere in the heart of America, from the homes of the citizens to the constitution.


The vast majority of this country identifies as Christian. Yet, when one turns on the television, all they see is Christians being depicted as dunces and fools. The atheists are apparently smarter than any believer. Anyone who is an atheist is accepted as smart and reasoned; anyone who has faith believes the earth is flat.


It is socially acceptable to attack Christians in this country. It is now part of our culture.


The latest example of this was in an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. Larry David, the main character of his own show, urinates on a portrait of Jesus. Even worse, the Christians, meant to look like chimps, are led to believe it’s a miracle because Jesus appeared to have a tear coming out of his eye.


I like Larry David. He is a funny comedian and his show is one of the best on television. But urinating on Jesus is over the top. It is highly offensive, yet he does not seem to care. HBO claims that the material was simply “playful” in a recent statement released by the company.


Or maybe one of the recent episodes of Real Time with Bill Maher, where the terrible female comedian bashes Catholics yet again. That video is below.

Abortion: Not A Woman's Issue

Abortion is by no means a woman's issue. Liberals and the feminists have brainwashed America to believe that it is somehow wrong to tell a woman what she can't do with her body. It may be her body, but at the time of conception there is an actual living human.


Do parents own their children? Or are they simply responsible for them? The arrogance of women never ceases to amaze me. The unborn child inside of her has it's own dna, it's own genes. It is a individual.

In this video I made, I lay out the argument for outlawing abortion. I also point out the hypocrisy and arrogance of women who are pro-choice.

Origins: Why Do We Even Exist?

If you watch tv and absorb information from the government-media complex daily, you may be led to believe that most people are secularist atheists that have no need for religion. Religion will be seen in a negative light, just an excuse for old men to molest children. Religion will be seen as a gateway to war and destruction. Religion will be seen as a leech on society, a belief system that is thousands of years old and is outdated.



While religion is responsible for death and crime, that does not validate atheism or discredit religion entirely. Religion is also reponsible for much good in the world that constantly goes over looked. Whether the essence of each religion is true is irrelevant to me.


Our universe is complex and diverse. Simply by looking up into the sky, we can all see it. The question is not, "Did God create the universe or did the universe create itself?" The proper question is, "What is the more probable scenario?"



Probability


Once you strip everything away, what is left? Once you accept the fact that we as humans know nothing, what is left? Humans can only understand those things which can be observed within time and space. Probability is all that remains.


Let's use a simple analogy in nature. There are two wild panthers in the jungle. One panther is a few years older than the other and has more experience in hunting and survival. The other panther is still of age to catch prey, however. Now let's say they both spot a racoon. Which panther will capture and eat the racoon first? Sure, it is within the realm of possibility that the younger less experienced panther could in fact get lucky. But the more likely explanation is that the older panther with capture the racoon first because of it's experience. No one can know for sure which would get to the racoon first, but any rational person would put their money on the older one.




Both atheism and theism are false (in the sense that neither can be empirically proven here and now). The existence of a god cannot be proven. The inexiestince of a god cannot be proven. Once you accept those two statements, what is left? The only truth in this world is that we know nothing for certain. Probability is all that remains and must become the primary system of thought and belief.



Here are my proofs that end the debate on whether or not it is rational to believe in God. #3 is the one that is most questionable by atheists. The reason it is there is simple: every cause has a causation. The only one that isn't explained is the origin of the universe. Therefore, it is more probable that the universe, to, had a cause. To say that the universe did not have a cause goes against this logic. Moreover, it is also worth noting that this causation would have to of been of a higher intelligence, given the complexity of our universe.




1. Neither theism or atheism can be proven.
2. It is possible that the universe either always existed or simply came into existence for no reason.
3. It is more probable that a deity or deities created the universe.
4. Therefore, theism is the most plausible, logical, rational and reasonable explanation for our existence.

Today's Western Woman

This is the true traditional viewpoint of what feminism is responsible for, articulated as best as I could. It's my first video, and I must say there are more to come.


Why does the middle east hate America so much? Why are we spat upon around the world? Everything can be traced back to the rise of feminism during the sex revolution, when everything pertaining to our culture went south. The middle east hates us because we have destroyed the family. The secular left, headed by teh feminists, have given America an identity which is laughed at and sneered at all around the world. People need to realize that by moving away from the traditional values of our founding fathers, we have effectively set in motion the downfall of our civilization.

Study: Women Reveal Why They Have Sex

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26039391-23272,00.html



According to this study, women aren't even attracted to men. Sex is almost a chore to them.


When it comes to sex, we guys always knew there are strange tendancies with women and sex. I've had girlfriends before. I have never used sex as a bargaining chip. I am sexual honest; I just want her badly. But for some reason women can control their sexuality to the point where they can decieve and plan in their head, such as getting you to buy them things or do chores for them in exchange for the sex.


If you honestly want to have sex, you'll go have it. There is no bargain. There are no dates, there is no chatter. There is no need for presents, theres no need for chores. Theres no need for getting to know each other deeper, you already know enough. There is just fucking. This is why the homosexual community is so permiscous; there is no woman around to say no. No woman to make them work for it. No woman to decieve and get them to buy them something first. No woman around to demand they wait longer so it can be more special.


This article pretty much exposes women sexually. I already knew this, but it's pretty clear that women can do without sex. Just think about it, if they really enjoyed sex then there would be no waiting and no need to butter her up first, or stroke her ego. There would be a period to get to know each other, then fucking all the time. Those would be healthier relationships. Those relationships would end in fewer divorces.


Everytime I analyze these type of issues I keep coming to the conclusion that it's the woman's fault. It's her fault he's angry because she never wants to cook or clean. It's her fault she gets beaten; she wanted the meathead that is twice her size and is a drunk. It's her fault the kids of the society are fucked up; she drove her husband away in divorce because he just wasnt good enough and because single mothers cant raise children for crap they grow up all screwed in the head. The majority of men in prison were raised by single mothers. And most of all, as it relates to this topic, women simply dont put out enough in relationships. Theres always strings attached.


It's pretty clear that women want men for things outside of who they actually are and how they look. It's completely a superficial attraction.