About My Recent Absence

My computer went down a few weeks ago. This is the main reason for me not making any new posts. Its a cheap Dell Laptop that only lasted 3 years. It has a virus that somehow uninstalled all my drivers for keyboard, internet, wireless, etc. I'm close to fixing it but when I do I will probably just sell it on Ebay.

Once I get a better computer, I will turn this blog more personal. It will be an honest journal of my experiences in life that have led me to who I am today. These will be full of complete honesty. I will also, of course, continue to make the usual posts along with it.

Until then, cheers folks.

"Dark Triad" Genes

The bad-boy question has been answered by science.

Nice guy genes do exist, and many unfortunate men have them. Women want these genes severed from the gene pool and thus existence:

Why women really do love self-obsessed psychopaths

"Peter Jonason, of New Mexico University in Las Cruces, believes that these traits may have an innate, genetic component that explains why some men seem unable to stop themselves behaving badly."


- Steve Connor, "Why women really do love self-obsessed psychopaths",

The traits that he refers to are "Dark Triads". These are traits such as narcissism, thrill-seeking, psychopathy, etc. Basically, quintessential bad-boy behavior. This study proves that it is what women really want, while they lie about wanting a humble honest respectful guy. What a fucking surprise, right?

However, let's use our intellect to take this a step further. Let's go beyond what the study says using deduction and logic. If there are "dark triad" genes, or in other words bad boy genes, then conversely there must exist nice-guy genes. These are the genes many lonely men possess, and it explains why they are alone and suffering.

Like I've said many times before, for the most part women want to weed the nice-guy genes out of existence. That's why they reject so many men and also inform their social circles not to date us after the rejection takes place. They don't want to be treated well. Women want psychopathic narcissists and they are lying if they say otherwise. I'm tired of every girl claiming they want one thing then turning around and blowing some guy with a neck-tattoo and a criminal record.

The looks faction is close, but they fail to make the quantum leap and recognize it comes down to genetics. The confidence mafia (those that believe the key is confidence) are way off.

"Looks" and "Confidence" are simply byproducts of good genes. Its all genes. And women are quasi-eugenicists.

The Arizona Shootings: Who's To Blame?

Yet another mass shooting has occurred recently, ironically right around the time I posted about the one that happened back in 2009 (see below post). Is this nothing new? Has this not happened before and for a similar reason? Or was he a lone nut? The answer, as it usually does, lies somewhere in the middle. Like with Sodini, this shooting (and the reasons it happened) is not cut-and-dry. There is more to this guy than meets the eye, and it surpasses the nerd-loner stereotype in my opinion.


All politics aside, this man, Jared Lee Loughner, was deeply troubled.


Most leave it at that.

"He was disturbed"
"He was mentally ill"
"This guy had a few screws loose"

What sickens me about society is the cowardice and disturbing inability to display empathy for those deemed unstable. Loughner may have been irrational, but why does no one ask what made him that way? My answer to that is one that I will always have in these situations: society has trouble pointing the finger at themselves. No one wants to admit that perhaps, just maybe, there were other factors that contributed to Loughner's shooting rampage.


And what of Lougner's politics? There is no doubt that his conspiracies about the government led to hatred of certain politicians. Some of his theories had slight merit; for instance, language does indeed control thought. However there is not substantial evidence that the government is forcing or subtly encouraging its population to speak a certain way. There is such a thing as political correctness, but those who wish to exercise free speech are still welcome to do so.

When I first heard of this story, I immediately knew that his failures with women had something to do with it. I just had the feeling, deep down. And, sure enough, the Wall Street Journal proved me to be correct recently when the following article was published:


"Postings of a Troubled Mind"

Whenever something like this occurs, miserable interactions with women are a culprit, if not the biggest one. What cannot be stressed enough is the importance of consistence sex and companionship that a man needs to keep his sanity. Its no joke. Its life and death. We are seeing examples of it over and over again. Men need sex, men need women that truly care about them as a person. One might jump to say, "But all people want that, including women!" Well, women are not the ones that experience loneliness the way men do.

Here's a question everyone must ask themselves: If Loughner had a girlfriend that loved and cared about him, would this tragedy have happened? No one can say for sure. It is a question for critical thought.

Women and Eugenics

Scenario: After being rejected by a woman, you discover that she also informed her friends of the debacle. Now not only has she rejected your advances, but she also ruined your chances with several other women. What is this inclination that women have and where does it come from? I am here with an answer: Eugenics

The image that you see to the left includes tools that have further enabled most women to be quasi-eugenicists. They can now line up all their prospects conveniently on a screen and carefully select what genes they want to allow to propagate. Its almost like shopping in the cereal isle for women. The over-abundance of options that even average plain-janes posses is remarkable, and in combination with social media, they can all use their sexual prowess to their advantage like never before. Make no mistake about it, social media has benefited women exclusively and has almost done as much harm to men that feminism has.

The Theory of Modern Female Quasi-Eugenicists

I am not saying that women are walking around reading your genetic code as a scientist would. That's not what I mean by quasi-eugenics. Your genes are expressed through your physical traits. Gene expression. Also known as phenotypes. Its eugenics on a small-scale; women control who gets laid and how, therefore they control propagation. If they reject you, they are rejecting your genes. When they go back to their social cliques and inform other females of how you were rejected and humiliated, she is sub-communicating that your genes are undesirable, and all the women should reject your genes from passing on as well. Now, she has successfully ended the possibility of your genes propagating with several more women in addition to herself.

Hence my term, quasi-eugenics.

In the following video, Mystery explains how being a victim of quasi-eugenics in tribal times directly relates to fearing the approach of women today:




But there is something else....something, elusive. The "IT" factor that was discussed in a previous thread. I think that women have some sort of intuition or animal-like quality that turns them on to the "IT" factor.

This is why many men can't understand why they are single and it seems to defy logic. Isn't it curious how the dating game has always been sort of an inside joke? In other words, dating has always been a sort of "if you have to ask, you aren't getting any" type deals. Those who have it have it, and they can't even successfully explain it to someone who does not. Kind of like how women always seem to give bad dating advice, as if they want you to fail.

The "IT" factor is something that has yet to be discovered that some lack, and women know it. Most guys have it, but some don't. Maybe its facial symmetry. Most likely, it is the gene that women can sense.

I mean, there are certainly things that can transcend all else, such as wealth and riches. Especially in America. I'm not stupid enough to suggest that even being rich wouldn't help lonely men. It would. My theory by and large has to do with normal people who exist outside of the top 2% of American society. Other guys try to compensate in other ways, such as getting super-jacked, getting nice tats, etc.



Let me give you an example of why none of this stuff even matters anyway: George Sodini

* He was worth $250,000. That is financial security
* He had a nice house, car, and stable job.
* He was built. He worked out at LA Fitness Gym.
* He went to PUA conventions


As you can see, he did everything that most people would jump to suggest for you to do if you complain about not getting women. People will say,

"you need to make at least decent money"
"you need a career and goals"
"you need to workout and become healthy and attractive"
"you need to learn how to talk to women. "

George Sodini did all of this and some. He went right down the checklist of requirements that women have. Yet, it was all in vein. Why?

Quasi-eugenics. His genes simply were not desirable, for no discernible reason. Women severed his genes off from society; forced him into celibacy and loneliness. The female eugenicists destroyed Sodini, so he in turn took the lives of 3 of them. I'm not condoning anything, but you see my point.

The difference between this and regular sexual selection

The abundance of selection that these women have, specifically in Western countries.

Women may be this way partly by nature. But guess what: in the 50's, they could most certainly NOT exhibit quasi-eugenic behavior, because society put barriers in place that controlled their sexuality. Now, those barriers don't exist and women have all the free reign in sexual selection that they want. Also not all women can have the power the be quasi-eugenicists, but most do. As long as she is a 6, she is a god among insects and will enjoy endless options until she hits age 53. 5's as well. Women below this still have options but its not as much and not guaranteed

Michael Savage talked about this. He said that shame is a good thing. When you do bad in school, you should feel ashamed. When women act promiscuous, they SHOULD be shamed by society and scorned. Unfortunately that does not exist in the West anymore. To many weak-minded men allowed this to happen.

I must point out however that I think most women in the dating game fall within the 6-10 range. Beauty seems to be common; Mystery (a famous pick-up artist) said this himself. I can vouch. On my college campus I can honestly say that ugly undesirable women are rare; I find myself attracted to the majority of them. All it takes is the right outfit and makeup, and women can all look above average and be selective breeders. So therefore, the vast majority of women are quasi-eugenicists and have the power to do it to men.

Another example is the Middle East...the men there do not allow their women to be eugenicists and control what genes get passed on. The nice guys in the middle east get their genes propagated, as well as most men there in general, good-looking or bad. Why, social barriers (i.e public shame, beatings. harsh but its necessary)

In China however, the government has become the eugenicist. The gender imbalance there was deliberately done by the communist regime. Men there are screwed to hell and they report very low sexual partners on average...sad.

All women are quasi-eugenicists by nature and as long as they have complete sexual freedom with no barriers, nice guy genes will continue to be weeded out of existence. This is why you see more and more psychopaths and douchebags in bars and clubs hording all of the women. Women chose the fathers of these men for that very reason, make no mistake about it.

Possible Solution: Get the Hell Out of This Country

So, I've been pondering about my location lately. I pretty much am fed up with America. Where should I go? Better yet, where can I go? Is it even feasible, given my particular situation, to move out of the country for good?

I sure as hell hope so.

The first thing on the list of things to remember would be the language barrier. I could encounter difficulties if I do not understand what anyone or anything says; moreover, I certainly would not be able to assimilate into the culture. That is what I ultimately want to do, move somewhere else, and completely convert to their way of life. This includes learning their language. English-speaking countries will be my first choice, but I will not rule out learning another language if the situation is nice enough

Here are a few places I've given serious thought to:

New Zealand




I've heard great things about this place. Perhaps...







Canada (Alberta)






I don't know. Saskatchewan, Quebec, Nova Scotia? I like the idea of Canada because I've been there and I have family that are citizens there. From what I hear, people are much friendlier in Canada. Everything I hear about the place is good.

However, people seem to dislike Toronto, so I'll stay away from there. The things I hear about Toronto are that it is even more expensive than New York, the women are notorious for being stuck-up, flaky, and unfriendly, and people are in general submersed in their own lives and not willing to make friends.

That's a huge factor for me. I have to be able to have a successful life amongst others, and Toronto's qualities seems similar to the Seattle Freeze in many ways.


For instance, check out the city-data forum for Toronto:
Toronto Forum on Difficulties in the Social Scene


Nonetheless, I will strongly consider everywhere else Canada.




Germany




The women are some of the most beautiful in the world. Seems like a cool place. I'd have to learn German, but I think I could do it. Who knows?





The Philippines





The demographics of men to women favors me here. They are all bilingual, so I wouldn't need to learn Philippine. I also hear this place is very friendly. Am I scared of 3rd world countries? Nope. I live in a terrible city as it is.



The U.K.











I once read somewhere that there is no paradise. Every place has its ups and downs, its share of problems. I recognize this reality and fully accept it. However, I am 90% positive that the U.S is not the place for me. One day, I hope to get away to one of the above mentioned places. I hope to thrive somewhere else, and just be happy.

What hinders me? Well, lets see. I'm not done with school, I will have a ton of loans to pay off when I graduate, and then I would have to find a job in the new place that could A) pay the loans and B) still leave me with enough to live off of.

Other than that, there's nothing stopping me. We'll see what happens. I need to get skills that I can market anywhere.

Strange, Startling Dream

Have you ever dreamed of a family member coming close to death? That's what I just had. It took me by complete surprise.

Today, I did what I usually do: School, then lunch, then home. I was depressed as I have been for months now. I was thinking about the past and how I wish I could change it, and about my current problems. I do this everyday. Then when I got home, I was mad at myself for missing opportunities to further connect with people on campus. I really should have stayed on campus instead of commuting.

So anyway, I get home, play some Xbox, then take a nap. 9/10 I don't get or remember my dreams. But this time, I dreamed about a certain family member coming close to death. The reason why this struck such a nerve and startled me so much, is because I have yet to have had to deal with the passing of someone close to me. All the deaths in my family have not been devastating, as I was not that close to those people.

I remember the dream in bits and pieces...I drove to some sort of amusement center. A Dave and Busters type place. (This reminds me of that movie Inception. DeCaprio explains in the movie that we do not remember the beginning of dreams usually, just the middle. He explained some other stuff that I can't recall that was related to this)




My close(debatable if this is true anymore) family member was there. As I was walking around, I saw this family member in line for something. Let's call the family member X. X had a pale skin tone. At first, I started to wonder why my skin wasn't pale, or if it was going to be pale, or if it now was.

Then, I had the horrible epiphany that X was about to die soon. Rather it was cancer or just old age, their time was coming to an end. X started talking to me in a way that was profoundly sad.

Then, at home, I broke down in tears while sitting next to X. I was about to tell X how sorry I was for everything I had done, and I was about to tell X the reasons why I was this way. Then I realized that I was only doing this because X was about to die...and I was ashamed. Just as I was about to tell X how sorry I was, I woke up from the dream. My heart was racing.

2 minutes later, X came into my room and asked if I could drive them to pick up their car. I said OK and was ready to go in 30 seconds. I dress fast. I'm not like other family member that takes 20 minutes to get ready to go anywhere. So, on the drive to the car shop, I asked X what they thought about my "check engine" light being on. X said it could be many things. Then, X said to keep checking the engine and it's many parts. X said that its like a person; I knew it's heartbeat more than anyone else, because it was my car. X said that just like observing a person, I should be able to tell if it was having trouble starting, trouble getting going, if it was near the end.

I know this is all coincidence. Nothing in my life has given me ample reason to believe in anything beyond the harsh realities of the world.

Game Changers

Game Changer That Will Favor Men

What we have in the United States is a full blown matriarchy. In the courtship process, women have all of the power and control. The male must do all of the work, from initiating to being the breadwinner. I've outlined this thoroughly in previous posts. See here


What can a guy do? Women are on such a high pedestal that even average to ugly ones have a multitude of options by default, while it is very easy for an average guy to have nothing at all. The simplest way of putting it is like this: a guy who is a 7 and a woman who is a 7 are not equal in their sexual-market value. The woman will certainly have more options than the guy. There will be flirtatious posts on her facebook wall everyday by random guys just waiting for their chance. She, of course, soaks in all the attention and will certainly continue to chase the alpha male (think "the situation" from Jersey Shore) that already HAS women chasing him. Illogical. She will be approached when she goes to the store, campus, clubs with her friends, bars, wherever. This is an advantage that cannot be stressed enough. The male is expected to have the burden of making the first move, while the woman can sit back and be picky, picky, picky, picky. If the guy says one wrong thing he's out the door. If he calls to early, he's a creep. If he calls to late, well, she's already forgotten him because she has so many options that his value is nothing. This is the plight of men.

Part of it is feminism, but an even larger part is obesity (see here ) and demographics; there are many more single men than there are single women in the age categories that are relevant.

1). The first is legislative: Fully Legalized Prostitution. I'm talking Keynesianism for safety/health (STD checks, etc), advertisements on television, and online ordering of hookers. Private businesses could thrive in this new (legal) market.

This will immediately remove all men from the dating pool that are only looking for sex. This in and of itself will decrease the sexual power of women everywhere 10 fold. All of a sudden, you will see less bitchiness less demanding, less superficiality, and less slutiness. American women will no longer be able to get away with these things because they would no longer hold the ultimate trump card over men: vagina. If a guy could buy it at a decent rate, without fear of a sting operation or disease, why go out and try to game/spend money on some undeserved woman?

The only way this can be achieved is politically of course. The Mens Movement needs electable public figures that will fight tooth and nail to get prostitution decriminalized in their respective locales. The entire movement would have to come together...all the PUA's, TFL, DJ's, Nice-guy's, Spearheads, even Incels. If they all were to band together and find leaders to put in public office, then that would be a start.

2) Sex Robots -

CNET Sex Robot Article

As you can read from the article above, sex-bots are becoming a reality.

Once Japan creates and refines a life-like robot that has realistic female body parts and can possibly cook/clean the house, feminism will begin to crumble. It doesn't take much thought to understand why having a sex robot could literally replace women. These robots, however, would certainly have to be made affordable. When the first wave of them hits the market, they will surely have extremely high price tags. Fortunately, as demand grows and technology continues to advance, the sex machines will slowly become affordable and pretty soon, these bots will be in almost every household. Wives will be forced to either give her man more pleasure or accept him getting it from his new robotic girlfriend. Of course, at first, there will be a bit of a stigma against owning one of these machines. This shaming language, which will undoubtedly include "loser", "virgin", "creep", etc, will come mostly from women that know that their sexual power over men is coming to an end.

Just check out the comments from that article. Here are a few:


"And, yes, I believe real people (male and female) are to blame for the dolls. Everyone just cares about themselves these days and this product caters to that. Imagine having your needs met anytime you want without having to consider someone else's?"

-celticbrewer

This is simply judgmental. So guys are only allowed the options of either catering to self-entitled princesses or just becoming hermits? Who is this guy to be against such a thing that will not effect his life?


"This is just wrong and creepy on many levels."

-gameking23

Shaming language. Judgments, judgments, judgments. I suppose everyone is perfect except this guy, right?


"It's depressing that people have sunk to this level. What kind of person would let a robot replace a person?"

-NerdusMaximus

I'm beginning to detect a pattern here... Everyone seems to have an idea in their heads of how others should act, and if you dare deviate from what societies deems as normal, you shall be shamed and insulted. That's how it works, folks.



3) Male Birth Control - This won't have as much of an effect as the previous 2 game changers, but it will certainly work in men's favor. The ability to screw raw-dog without fear of impregnating the sperm recipient will revolutionize sexual control for men, while lowering the risk of paying her for 18+ years. Women, for whatever reason, seem to have trouble taking their birth control on schedule. They tend to "forget", or swear that it didn't work once they get pregnant. We know these are lies and that girls know they can financially entrap a man by getting pregnant, hence the reason they purposefully do away with their pills from time to time.