Article: "Date a Boy That Travels"

I recently came across an article from the Huffington Post, "Date a Boy That Travels", written by Lena Desmond. And as I read it, the piece reminded me all too much of the women of my past that I have come across or dated. Particualrly my ex-girlfriend, whom is somewhat like Desmond in her unrealistic standards and fantasies of what men are supposed to be. Read the article below:

Date a boy who travels. Date a boy who treasures experience over toys, a hand-woven bracelet over a Rolex. Date the boy who scoffs when he hears the words, "vacation," "all-inclusive" or "resort." Date a boy who travels because he's not blinded by a single goal but enlivened by many. You might find him in an airport or at a book store browsing the travel guides -- although he "only uses them for reference." You'll know it's him because when you peek at his computer screen his background will be a scenic splendor of rolling hills, mountains or prayer flags. His Facebook friend count will be over-the-roof and his wall will be plastered with the broken English 'miss-you' of friends he met along the way. When he travels he makes lifelong friends in an hour. And although contact with these friends is sporadic and may be far-between his bonds are unmessable and if he wanted he could couch surf the world... again.

Buy him a beer. Maybe the same brand that he wears on the singlet under his plaid shirt, unable to truly let go. Once a traveller gets home people rarely listen to his stories. So listen to him. Allow him to paint a picture that brings you into his world. He might talk fast and miss small details because he's so excited to be heard. Bask in his enthusiasm. Want it for yourself. He'll squeak like an excited toddler when his latest issue of National Geographic arrives in the mail. Then he'll grow quiet, engrossed, until he finishes his analysis of every photo, every adventure. In his mind he'll insert himself in these pictures. He'll pass the issue on to you and grill you about your dreams and competitively ask about the craziest thing you've ever done. Tell him. And know that he'll probably win. And if by chance you win, know that his next lot in life will be to out do you. But then he'll say, "Maybe we can do it together."

Date the boy who talks of distant places and whose hands have explored the stone relics of ancient civilizations and whose mind has imagined those hands carving, chiseling, painting the wonders of the world. And when he talks it's as if he's reliving it with you. You can almost hear his heart racing. You can almost feel the adrenaline ramped up by the moment. You feel it passing through his synapsis, a feast to his eyes entering through those tiny oracles of experience that we call pupils, digesting rapidly through his veins, manifesting into his nervous system, transforming and altering his worldview like a reverse trauma and finally passing but forever changing the colors of his sight. (Unless he's Karl Pilkington.) You will want this too.

Date a boy who's lived out of a backpack because he lives happily with less. A boy who's travelled has seen poverty and dined with those who live in small shanties with no running water, and yet welcome strangers with greater hospitality than the rich. And because he's seen this he's seen how a life without luxury can mean a life fueled by relationships and family rather than a life that fuels fancy cars and ego. He's experienced different ways of being, respects alternative religions and he looks at the world with the eyes of a five-year-old, curious and hungry. Your dad will be happy too because he's good with money and knows how to budget.

This boy relishes home; the comfort of a duvet, the safety stirred in a mom-cooked meal, the easy conversation of childhood friends and the immaculate glory of the flush-toilet. Although fiercely independent, he has had time to reflect on himself and his relationships. Despite his wanderlust he knows and appreciates his ties to home. He has had a chance to miss and be missed. Because of this he also knows a thing or two about goodbyes. He knows the overwhelming uncertainty of leaving the comforts of home, the indefinite see-you-laters at the departure gates and yet he fearlessly goes into the unknown because he knows the feeling of return. And that the I've-missed-you-hug is the best type of hug in the whole world. He also knows that goodbyes are just prolonged see-you-laters and that 'hello' is only as far away as the nearest internet cafe.

Don't hold onto this boy. Let this boy go and go with him. If you haven't travelled, he will open your eyes to a world beyond the news and popular perception. He will open your dreams to possibility and reality. He will calm your nerves when you're about to miss a flight or when your rental blows a flat because he knows the journey is the adventure. He will make light of the unsavory noises you make when you -- and you will -- get food poisoning. He will make you laugh through the discomfort all while dabbing your forehead with a cold cloth and nursing you with bottled water. He will make you feel like you're home.

When you see something beautiful he will hold your hand in silence, in awe the history of where his feet stand and the fact that you're with him.

He will live in every moment with you because this is how he lives his life. He understands that happiness is no more than a string of moments that displace neutrality and he is determined to tie as many of these strings together as he can. He also understands your need to live for yourself and that you have a bucket list of your own. Understand his. Understand that your goals may at some points differ but that independence is the cornerstone of a healthy relationship when it's mutually respected. You may lose him for a bit but he will always come home bearing a new story and a souvenir he picked up because it reminded him of you, like it was made for you and because he missed you. You might be compelled to do the same. Make sure that independence is on your bucket list and make sure it's checked. Independence will keep your relationship fresh and exciting and when you're together again it will forge a bond of unbreakable trust.

He'll propose when you've breached your comfort-zone, whether it is a fear like skydiving or swimming with sharks or sitting next to the smelly person on an overcrowded bus. It won't be with a diamond ring but with a token from a native culture or inspired by nature, like the penguin and the pebble. You will get married somewhere unassumed, surrounded by a select few in a moment constructed to celebrate venturing into the unknown together again. Marry the boy who's travelled and together you will make the whole world your home. Your honeymoon will not be forgotten to a buffet dinner and all-you-can-drink beach bars, but will be remembered in the triumphant photographs at the top of Kilimanjaro and memorialized in the rewarding ache of muscles at the end of a long days hike. When you're ready you will have children that have the names of the characters you met on your journeys, the foreign names of people who dug a special place in your heart if only for a few days. Perhaps you will live in another country and your children will learn of language and customs that open their minds from the very start, leaving no room for prejudice. He will introduce them to the life of Hemingway, the journey of Santiago, and empower them to live even bigger than both of you.

Marry a boy who travels and he'll teach your children the beauty of a single stone, the history of the Incas and he will instill in them the bravery of possibility. He will explain to them that masking opportunity there is fear. He will teach them to concur it. And when you're old you'll sit with your grandchildren pouring over your photo albums and chest of worldly treasures while they too insert themselves into your photographs, sparked by the beauty of the world and inspired by your life in it.

Find a boy who travels because you deserve a life of adventure and possibility. You deserve to live light and embrace simplicity. You deserve to look at life through the eyes of youth and with your arms wide open. Because this is where you will find joy. And better, you will find joy together. And if you can't find him, travel. Go. Embrace it. Explore the world for yourself because dreams are the stuff reality is made from.

This attitude is all-too-common among American women. Placing unrealistic expectations upon men, based on nothing more than their brainwashed influences from the media. The point about Facebook friends is quite striking. A man must have a friends list that rivals a celebrity to be considered worthy in her eyes--- because her man must be universal, appealing to many different forms of life around the world. She has fallen in love not with the man, but his hobby of traveling and making friends. It isn't about love, or the person's character, instead it is about his social prowess and the "experiences" he can enhance her life with. Little does she know that men like this are often flighty, cheaters, disloyal, and simply cannot be depended on for a monogamous relationship. But that will not stop the American female from fawning over and idolizing the man. It isn't really about having a companion to travel with; no, the woman wishes to live vicariously through the man.

Would Obama Have Been President Without a White Mother?

The political rise of Barack Obama is quite astonishing for any individual. Born into humble beginnings, Obama grew up in Hawaii, attended an elite private school, and was reared by a white woman pursuing a PhD. Ann Dunham is pictured above with her son Barack.

Which brings me to the crux of the issue; that is to say, Obama could not have become president if he was raised by a black woman. No black woman could have produced what this man has become, and it has to do as much with race as it does culture.

To become what Obama did, his upbringing had to have come from a white household. Because in the mind of a white female, race is a non-issue for the most part and where it materializes, it can be ignored and overcome for a colored minority. Barack’s mother of course was well aware of her son’s appearance, coupled with the fact that he would be seen as black in society. But there is a distinct difference between how this single white mother dealt with this reality and how a single black mother would. Had Barack been raised by a single black woman, assuming she was not a ghetto hood-rat, his mentality would have been significantly limited in its ability to grasp the “big picture” of life. And this is precisely because the black point of view is severely limited, while whites know no such boundaries.

To further the point through scenario, take the inevitable “race” conversation that Obama’s hypothetical black mother would have with her mixed-race son. She would of course encourage him to do well in school, and push him to succeed (Again, this is assuming that this mother is at least somewhat educated). However, detrimental seeds of doubt would penetrate young Barack’s mind when his mother brings his race into the conversation. She would first remind him that despite his mixed heritage, he will be seen as black in society, and he will be discriminated against, and he must always keep a watchful eye out for racism directed towards him. She would poison his mind with limited thinking, based on the standards of the past.

The difference is, Barack’s white mother would, by and large, allow him to come to these conclusions on his own. But she would not promote to him the self-defeated attitude of African Americans, for she can neither relate or truly understand what a racial limitation is, due to her white privilege.

Perhaps the largest divider between colored minorities and whites in America is how they perceive race and racism. A situation in which a white individual might find no wrongdoing, or no oppression, can be perceived in the opposite way for a black person. And in many cases the subtle racism or oppression is real, but can only be observed through the lens of a colored minority. Whites, knowing where they lie in the invisible but very real racial hierarchy, do not have need for such worries. Thus, for the most part, whites are content with ignorance in this context; however, it is just as important to acknowledge that ignorance is indeed bliss.

Furthermore, whites understand society through no particular racial scope. Thus, laying the foundation for privilege, because there are no limits in this world for the descendants of European conquerors. Conversely, blacks profoundly understand their race to be crippling; no matter how far they ascend, no matter what they achieve, always will they be the negro. To the Arab, "Abid", to most of the world, "Nigger", the constant reminder of inferiority is ever-upon the blacks, especially the American Blacks, who in addition to being inferior are seen as lower than any other black diaspora in the world. Why is this the case? To be precise, culture. No one respects the American Black, even African nationals from countries such as Nigeria, Ghana, Sudan, or Ethiopia. Blacks from Spanish speaking countries share the same venom for American blacks, as do blacks from Middle Eastern countries. The obvious difference between all of these groups and American blacks is culture; everyone seems to have one except for the African American. Is it true? In parting, listen to the words of an Ethiopian, who is black but not American:

Is Aryane Steinkopf the Perfect Woman?

After looking at over 100 photos of Aryane Steinkopf, I have come to the conclusion that she leaves nothing to be desired. This is a perfect 10/10 and there is no woman on earth that could show her up. She literally has it all. Its no surprise that she hails from Brazil. Now sit back and enjoy the eye candy

Bob Barr and the Purity of the White Race

Bob Barr was the Libertarian candidate for President back in 2008. I've had many opinions on the guy but there are many that did not cross my mind until I searched further into the depths of the internet. What I found were various blogs accusing Barr of being non-white, specifically black. At first, I did a double take. The man looks white to my eyes, but perhaps I was missing something. So I looked harder at every picture of the guy I could find and eventually I saw what could possibly be a sign of African ancestry, however the guy still looked white overall

Now, observe the Nazis in the blogosphere
"Group News Blog makes a point that us politically-aware Negroes have been thinking for some time, though not around white folk. But this is the age of Obama so here it goes--Folks, there's something vaguely familiar about Bob Barr: You see, Bob Barr has long been the butt of many jokes in my family since the ugly winter of 1998. He was such a annoying, little pit bull against Clinton, you just wanted to smack him...but...There was something odd about him. Something that was "off". Media people have noted that "offness" of late, but I will tell you that this has been long discussed in other more insular circles. Bob Barr, um...well...as my mother said it "Looks a little 'funny' 'round the mouth...Dig the lips, folks...That ain't collagen...that's collards and Coltrane. Funny-ass hair texture too--particularly on the 'stache. "Rev. Al's shit is straighter than Barr's is." one friend loves to note frequently. The first time I saw Bob Barr, during his Bill Clinton-pursuing heyday, I thought to myself, "I didn't know there were was another black Republican in the House besides J.C. Watts." I have of course since been corrected, but I have to say, there really is some Anatole Broyard/Nella Larsen/Jessie Fauset business going on with this cat."

And here is another blog post accusing Barr of non-whiteness The reason I point this out is that it is very telling of the way America views race. That is to say, in America, there are whites and then there's everyone else. Candidates to be considered white must appear purely white, without a shadow of a doubt. If there is a doubt, the person thus becomes a minority. It doesn't really matter which minority either. For the whites, all that matters is their purity, but they actually don't care much beyond that. No concern is shown for whatever the non-white claims or identifies as, so long as it is not a white identity. We've seen this evolve throughout history, starting in the beginnings of mass immigration to America. When the Irish arrived, they were labeled non-white. Still to this day, many do not concern east Europe (Ukraine, Poland, etc) as white, or at least they consider the east European inferior to the Anglo Saxon.

In America, those of partial (no matter how small) non-white blood find out very quickly that they are not white. It is the way of things. You will not find a society on Earth that has such draconian views on racial status, but perhaps that's what makes this nation great (or not so great?) Take a hard look at Baehner and his sister. It's only a matter of time before they are both expelled from the white race. Because the white is pure and must remain holy

What I am not interested in is how we will all look in 50 years, as many wonder. It is speculated that eventually America will look like Latin America. More interesting to me however is what status will be given to which select individuals. How will classifications change? Who will be considered inferior once the population begins to blend?

The Female Ego

Today I was pondering the recent 2012 London Olympics contreversey (certainly not a serious one) involving Lebron James and U.S Swimmer Lauren Perdue. Below is a picture of Perdue:

^^^^Isn't she lovely? Well, sort of in that "I'd donkey punch her" kind of way...^^^ Shortly after, Perdue tweeted the following: https://twitter.com/UVA/status/228606976576344064. "Lebron James just invited me to dinner... um wuuuutttt?!?" And then, chaos ensued. It was all over the media. No one quite knew what to make of it other than Lebron, an engaged NBA Champion, just got publicly turned down. But what strikes me is how excited this Lauren seems that she was "invited to dinner" by Lebron himself. In fact, to me, the tweet is reeking of an egotistical, high-and-mighty, "look at me", uppity, cunty, shallow, junior high, arrogant stench that is both vomit educing and all-to-common among today's American female. What gets me is, this was not the only girl Lebron asked out on that night (probably). Pictured below is Lebron with yet another female Olympian.

He most likely casually offered to eat with her that night in the dining hall as well. Lauren was clearly not the only one, and yet her level of excitement over such a small proposition is hysterical; I'd expect the same reaction from a girl in middle school. "OMG! I just got asked out wtf?!?!? What is a poor girl to do?" Lather in the pool of egomaniac attention whoring, of course. This is yet another example of the despicable way women react when approached and propositioned for dates. It isn't enough to appreciate the offer; they get off on the power trip, the advantage given to them by being catered to. They revel in the attention, enjoy rejecting the man, and can't live without bragging about it to their friends (or in this case, the whole world through twitter).

Are All Women Prostitutes? A Thought Provoking Article

I recently came across an excellent article (forum post) that further extrapolates on a previous post I made about the undeniable correlations between the modern dating process and prostitution. The post was made by a user named "Below 30" on Bodybuilding.com. You will see my commentary bolded and in parentheses.

"According to society (backed by government laws) Prostitution (the business accepting financial compensation for sex), is immoral and illegal in most countries. Where is the line drawn though for who can be considered a prostitute, from a hooker on the street corner, to meeting a morally acceptable female and paying for many dates before sex happens? -Females are the focus here since it's a fact that they do not generally do the approaching in the mating game- When a man is approached by a woman on the street and she offers to let him have her body sexually in exchange for money, she's a prostitute and a bad person. When a man meets a woman in a book store, if he were to say; "Hi, I like you. Would like to have sex with me?", he will be rejected and probably have the police called on him. So the man meets the woman in the book store, says morally acceptable things to her, gets her phone number, calls her up and sets up a date. On the date he will spend $75 and at the end of the date, he will go for the kiss and want sex from her. She will most likely turn her head away and tell him that she won't allow the sex yet.

On average, after 3 dates, the female will let the man have sex with her. The man has spent approximately $225 on the female in almost 4 weeks of dating. So basically, the female required financial compensation before she would allow the man to have access to her body. That is prostitution, but it's the acceptable form by society's standards. If two girls notice a guy and talk about how 'cute' his and he happened to come over and say; "Hi, I'm sexually attracted to you. Would you like to have sex with me?", again she would reject him as if he made a racist remark, even though she acknowledged to her friend how she was attracted to him (TIC:An excellent point indeed. It's very true that even if a girl is attracted to you, she many times will not give you any leverage or advantage over the other competing males. You will still be expected to be confident, funny, ask for her number, ask her out on a date, pay for the date, and repeat the dating process 2-3 times before getting anything beyond a makeout session)

Men have no problems with seeing an attractive female and allowing sexual relations to happen right away. This is because society accepts that men are sexually upfront. (TIC:Put simply, men are sexually honest while women are sexually dishonest, save hookers) Females in the sexual sense are virtually the same (mentally) as men, but society put stipulations on females to control them, as society was basically started by men long ago. This was to prevent females from being like men and having multiple sex partners and made it easier for men to dominate females in society. But that plan has actually back-fired, because females have an easier time controlling their sexual impulses than men biologically. What has happened now, is that females have learned how to give out just enough signals to lead a man on and hold the rest back until he pays for the rest.

Prostitution is a business like any other and to be successful, you have to invest in your product. That product in this case, is the female herself. This is why they invest so much in makeup, hair care and plastic surgery. They need to stand out and exude high value. This way, men will see the cost they have to pay for access to her body, as reasonable. Men are so desperate for the sex that they will pay the price and ignore the fact the she is basically a prostitute. Since men still rule when it comes to laws in society, prostitution is still known only as the act of exchanging 'paper money' on the street for sex and not general dating. If people's minds weren't so clouded, prostitution would either become legal, or dating would become illegal too. (TIC: An excellent breakdown of the structure of dating in business terms. Dating is indeed very much like a business where you have investing, advertising (sexy outfits, etc), selling, buying, and even a black market (escort services).

Many women will claim that they need to get to know a man first before sex.
Lies!
Just like men, when a female sees a man she's sexually attracted too, she could have sex right away. Proof? Street prostitutes are human females too and all they need to see is cash and she has sex with him. So there is no biological reason why most females couldn't allow sex with a man she's attracted to right away. (TIC: Exactly, the female would rather get a few free dinners/movies first even if she was instantly sexually attracted to the man) It goes to prove for the most part that even the most shy, innocent, religious girl knows exactly what she's doing when she makes the guy spend all sorts of money and time before the sex happens. But they will be damned if they were to admit that what they do is prostitution.

Here's some interesting irony. Street prostitutes are actually the most respectable females in the mating game. Because they are upfront with their requirement to be paid a set price before the sex is to happen (TIC: Correct. Intelligent men know this to be true. I have much more respect for a hooker/stripper, because with them, at least there are no hidden motives or games. Everything is on the table. You want sex, she wants money. There is no deception to deal with as you must endure with legal prostitutes(women in general). The rest of the females in society, pretend to need 'Time' and the only way to pass this 'Time', is for her to be taken to places that involve money being spent on her. Once that money has been spent, it's still not a guarantee that she will give up the sex, thus the man is wasting alot of time and money on a so-called 'nice girl or proper girl'.

Dating females is legal prostitution because the financial compensation is indirect. Legal prostitution is morally acceptable but is the most taxing on the man, because he must invest so much time and money for an uncertain payoff of sex in the end"

My final thoughts are a resounding "yes", the vast majority of women are indeed prostitutes one way or another. If money is required for sex, no matter how indirect the process, that is prostitution. If you wouldn't fuck the guy for free, you’re a prostitute

Lonliness, Suicide: A Male Issue Only

Loneliness is a male issue. Women do not have to fear such a thing. A socially awkward guy in today's society is a creepy loser who is considered an outcast. He is less than nothing to women. They want nothing to do with him.

A socially awkward female still will get hit on and still will get dates from guys. It doesn't matter how shy she may be. Men will still attempt to reach out and form a relationship with her because at the end of the day, men are more compassionate and much less cruel than women.

Back when men ruled things, everyone had a mate. It was unheard of a person in their 30's to be single. The epidemic of loneliness is recent and is a direct result of women having all the control in the dating scene. Women are quasi-eugenicists and do not want genes to pass on that they deem to be weak; social anxiety/awkwardness fits this category of weakness.

If we are talking a 400 pound whale with meth-mouth, fine, of course she's lonely. But here's what you are doing that is so foolish: basing your entire argument on extremely rare exceptions. An average guy can easily be lonely in today's society. An average women could never be unless she deliberately chose too. The vast vast vast majority of lonely people are men and it is by and large a male issue only. Women do not have the danger of being alone and will most likely never experience being alone.

The statistics below are from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. As you will observe, men commit suicide "at a rate four times that of women." This is in spite of the fact that women attempt suicide more often than men.

By Gender

Sex Number of Suicides Population Rate
Males 27,269 148,466,361 18.3
Females 7,329 152,823,971 4.8
Total 34,598 301,290,332 11.5

Figures from the National Center for Health Statistics for the year 2007.
All rates are per 100,000 population.


A woman takes her own life every 90 minutes in the U.S., but it is estimated that one woman attempts suicide every 78 seconds.

* Women attempt suicide three times as much as men.
* Although women attempt suicide more often, men complete suicide at a rate four times that of women.
* More women than men report a history of attempted suicide, with a gender ratio of 2:1.
* Women are more likely than men to have stronger social supports, to feel that their relationships are deterrents to suicide, and to seek psychiatric and medical intervention, which may contribute to their lower rate of completed suicide.

-© 2011 American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.

The harsh reality of the world is that men bare the heaviest burden's in life, while women over-exaggerate and dramatize anything and everything in order to garner attention. Ironically, women already have more attention than men, which is why they are much more likely to receive help from support groups and their group of friends.

Can men do this? Yes and no. While it is possible for men to receive help when they are feeling depressed and suicidal, it is looked down upon in society. A man is not allowed to cry to his male friends about his problems. A man is supposed to shutup, suck it up, and handle it all by himself. If he does not, society labels him weak.

More specifically, women label him weak. Women can lose respect for a man very quickly; this is where genetics come into play. Women despise passive, nice-guy genes. They wish them to be breeded out of existence. Conversely, women seem to adore and worship the "dark triad" genes. These genes include narcissism and psychopathic behavior. Girls, especially young ones, are obsessed with dangerous bad-boys. Below is an example:

"Teenage Love Triangle Turns Deadly"

Feminism and The Burden of the Approach

Imagine a world where men and women were truly equal. Not just equal on an economic level, but on a societal level as well. This is what the feminists fought so long for, is it not? Think about dating. In order for any relationships, marriages, and procreation to occur, there must be an initial approach. Someone must break the ice. Someone must have the courage to walk up to a total stranger and say "hi" and subsequently spark interest and attraction through conversation.


That someone is a male, 90-95% of the time.


This does not sound like equality. Does it sound like equality to you? Why is it OK for feminists to be hypocrites on this particular issue? Women claim to be seen as equal to men in every way, but somehow this outdated social norm stayed in place. No, women do not want equality. Women still want men to approach and break the ice with them, ask for their number, set up dates in which the man pays, and later initiate a kiss or sex. She still expects him to get on one knee and ask for her hand in marriage. And still in most cases, she expects the man to be the breadwinner of the household.


Now what part of that says equality? We know that women are well within their means to meet men halfway on all of those things. So why don't they? All women benefit from the fruits of feminism whether they claim to be one or not.


Let's delve deeper into the burden of the approach. Let's examine the risks a man takes when he approaches a woman:


1. Rejection- This one is obvious. As men we expect to be rejected often and we are never given a reason for it. A woman will rarely tell you the real reason that she is rejecting you. She will make up an excuse, but you will never know what you did wrong or what is particularly wrong with you. This is especially troubling since it means that there is no way to improve because the man has gained no knowledge for the rejection. It could have be for anything. Only her, God and her girlfriends know


2. Embarrassment- Now I've been in many clubs and bars. I've had some success and some failures. Embarrassment is really an interesting occurrence. It can only happen when there is a power balance in a given dialogue. It happens when one party has the upper hand and the other party has the lower. The party with the upper hand is almost always the woman. Since the man approached her first, he is lowering himself and putting himself at a disadvantage. Now he is in many ways at her mercy. She can toy with him if she wants. She can lead him on. She could be nice and reject him, or be mean and reject him. She could even accept him and decide she doesn't like him later. The point is, there is an infinite amount of ways a woman could handle a man that has approached her. I'll give a recent example that happened to me in a bar. I came up to a pretty woman and started a conversation. Her and her friends were taking pictures so I jumped in on one. I was being spontaneous and having fun. She seemed to as well. After a few minutes, I asked her for a dance. She replied, "I'm not dancing with any guys tonight". Right there I knew she did not want anything to do with me, at least romantically. I took it in stride. Because it was a crowded bar, I really didn't have many places to walk to. So I stood around for a while. After a minute or so, she got up out of her seat and started dancing with random guys, right in front of me. Now you may ask yourself, "why would she do such a cold, rude thing?" Well I don't know and I never will. But what I do know is that there are many women out there just like this and because men are at such a blatant disadvantage and are always at a low position, they are at risk of this kind of thing happening to them all the time at social gatherings.


3. Physical Violence- That's right. There is a tendancy for women to say in their heads, "you and him fight". Women like drama. They thrive on it. One of the things they love is when two men fight over them. So whenever you see a bar fight, it usually involves a woman. It usually occurs because some woman felt like seeing her man beat up another man. Such is the cold hearted nature of most Western Women. I'll even give an example from my experience in a club: I approached a girl and out of nowhere some guy came up and tried to start a fight with me. I thought it was clear that she was single, but you never know I guess. She didn't do anything to provoke this exchange, but as you can imagine I put myself at great risk just by trying to talk to a girl. So to the women that say "just be yourself and approach a girl we don't bite! We'll be flattered that you came up to us!", you're full of it.



This is what men are reduced to. This is what men face everyday. Rejection, embarrassing, and physical violence. These are things that women never have to face in the dating scene. They just sit there like the conceited cunts they are and accept or deny advances. That is all a woman has to do: accept or deny advances.


This brings me to a recent controversy involving a feminist, Rebecca Watson. Everything started with a awkward moment in an elevator. She got on and there was one other man. The man complimented her by saying she was interesting. He then proceeded to ask her if she wanted to have coffee in his room. She of course made this video later complaining about how he was sexually objectifying her and other bullshit.






Does she realize that men will die virgins if they do not risk such awkward moments? Does she have any appreciation for his compliment? It seems as though Rebecca Watson and other feminists like her do everything in their power to shun, ridicule, and suppress male sexuality.


In her perfect world, half of the male population would be imprisoned for improperly approach women.

My Two Favorite Pornstars

Now I know what you're thinking: this blog is taking a lowbrow turn. But we as men sometimes must sit back and admire female beauty. It is why God put them on earth. I've watched an adequate amount of porn over the years as most guys do. I've been amazed at how hot some of these girls are, but these two in particular take the cake for me.

Jynx Maze






Brooke Lee Adams

Rape Culture and Its True Culprits

I was lying back while drinking beer and watching television. On the side of me is a female friend who is doing the exact same thing. A conversation ensues between the two of us about what a man must do in order to get a date with a woman. The context was of a mutual friend of ours who has trouble in this department. I told her the story of how he was recently rejected by a female coworker of his. She went on with her advice as to why he was failing with women. But somewhere along the line she said something that disturbed me and gave me a keen understanding as to why so many women get raped. What she said was not at all original or revolutionary in its essence, but when the words


“Sometimes a girl likes to be chased. She wants to feel wanted”


I instantly knew the root cause of the so called “rape culture” in the U.S.



Women are notorious for always warning men that “no means no”. For us men who have dealt with enough women, we know this to be pure malarkey. If “no” always meant “no”, many men would die virgins. There would also be fewer rapes as a result, because for once women would mean what they said instead of talking in indirect code language.


Women, many times, bring rape upon themselves. They purposely reject men, even ones they are interested in, in order to get him to chase her. Since women love to be the prize and the center of attention, leading a man on a wild goose chase through all sorts of hoops and mind games is all too common in today’s society. What this does is blur the line between what is acceptable for a man to do to a woman and what is not…because once we can all agree that women want to be chased, we can understand what a predicament it puts men into. Since “no” does not always mean “no”, there is no real way for a man to know when to stop his advances upon a woman.



My theory as to why women give such pieces of advice goes back to dark triad genes or the lack thereof. You see, when a woman tells a man that he should just be himself, or to respect women, or to give them compliments, or that “no means no”, what she is actually doing is bullshitting the male. This is a weeding out mechanism that women use in order to ensure that men who don’t get it never will. You see, women do not want nice guys to propagate their genes. They do not wish for them to be successful with women. This is why advice coming from women is never good; it has been sabotaged from the get-go.



Women have the power and control in the dating scene. This is important to note because it means that any and every problem with society in the context of female-male relations falls on the shoulders of women themselves. If women decide to start dating men who are genuine, nice, and honest, then that is what most men will become. Since women, however, are only attracted to males with dark triad genes, that is what most men strive to be. The ones that do not either are alone or being used. Moreover, since women have decided to make men chase and act in an overly-aggressive fashion in order to get sex, the rape culture pervades society. Make no mistake about it, women invariably cause most rapes.



Now, this is not to say that specific individuals who are victims of raped caused it or even desired it. The point is that women overall have created an environment in which only sexually aggressive, narcissistic, abrasive men are seen as sexually attractive (these traits are what women interpret as being “confident”). They have created an environment in which “no” doesn’t mean “no”, it actually means “try harder, keep going, I want to be chased, I want to feel wanted even though you’ve already made it clear that you want me. I want to play games and toy with you until I’m satisfied.” Men are constantly placed in awkward, unsure situations because what women want is always esoteric. Should he approach? If she rejects him, should he continue his advances because that’s what she may want deep down? Who knows? For many men, leaving things to chance is not an option. They will continue to press the issue in order to find out the woman’s true intentions.


Thus is the nature of women: enablers of the very thing they claim to despise the most

And....

He's back. As you can see, the new computer is in. There will be much more to come ladies and gents

About My Recent Absence

My computer went down a few weeks ago. This is the main reason for me not making any new posts. Its a cheap Dell Laptop that only lasted 3 years. It has a virus that somehow uninstalled all my drivers for keyboard, internet, wireless, etc. I'm close to fixing it but when I do I will probably just sell it on Ebay.

Once I get a better computer, I will turn this blog more personal. It will be an honest journal of my experiences in life that have led me to who I am today. These will be full of complete honesty. I will also, of course, continue to make the usual posts along with it.

Until then, cheers folks.

"Dark Triad" Genes

The bad-boy question has been answered by science.

Nice guy genes do exist, and many unfortunate men have them. Women want these genes severed from the gene pool and thus existence:

Why women really do love self-obsessed psychopaths

"Peter Jonason, of New Mexico University in Las Cruces, believes that these traits may have an innate, genetic component that explains why some men seem unable to stop themselves behaving badly."


- Steve Connor, "Why women really do love self-obsessed psychopaths",

The traits that he refers to are "Dark Triads". These are traits such as narcissism, thrill-seeking, psychopathy, etc. Basically, quintessential bad-boy behavior. This study proves that it is what women really want, while they lie about wanting a humble honest respectful guy. What a fucking surprise, right?

However, let's use our intellect to take this a step further. Let's go beyond what the study says using deduction and logic. If there are "dark triad" genes, or in other words bad boy genes, then conversely there must exist nice-guy genes. These are the genes many lonely men possess, and it explains why they are alone and suffering.

Like I've said many times before, for the most part women want to weed the nice-guy genes out of existence. That's why they reject so many men and also inform their social circles not to date us after the rejection takes place. They don't want to be treated well. Women want psychopathic narcissists and they are lying if they say otherwise. I'm tired of every girl claiming they want one thing then turning around and blowing some guy with a neck-tattoo and a criminal record.

The looks faction is close, but they fail to make the quantum leap and recognize it comes down to genetics. The confidence mafia (those that believe the key is confidence) are way off.

"Looks" and "Confidence" are simply byproducts of good genes. Its all genes. And women are quasi-eugenicists.

The Arizona Shootings: Who's To Blame?

Yet another mass shooting has occurred recently, ironically right around the time I posted about the one that happened back in 2009 (see below post). Is this nothing new? Has this not happened before and for a similar reason? Or was he a lone nut? The answer, as it usually does, lies somewhere in the middle. Like with Sodini, this shooting (and the reasons it happened) is not cut-and-dry. There is more to this guy than meets the eye, and it surpasses the nerd-loner stereotype in my opinion.


All politics aside, this man, Jared Lee Loughner, was deeply troubled.


Most leave it at that.

"He was disturbed"
"He was mentally ill"
"This guy had a few screws loose"

What sickens me about society is the cowardice and disturbing inability to display empathy for those deemed unstable. Loughner may have been irrational, but why does no one ask what made him that way? My answer to that is one that I will always have in these situations: society has trouble pointing the finger at themselves. No one wants to admit that perhaps, just maybe, there were other factors that contributed to Loughner's shooting rampage.


And what of Lougner's politics? There is no doubt that his conspiracies about the government led to hatred of certain politicians. Some of his theories had slight merit; for instance, language does indeed control thought. However there is not substantial evidence that the government is forcing or subtly encouraging its population to speak a certain way. There is such a thing as political correctness, but those who wish to exercise free speech are still welcome to do so.

When I first heard of this story, I immediately knew that his failures with women had something to do with it. I just had the feeling, deep down. And, sure enough, the Wall Street Journal proved me to be correct recently when the following article was published:


"Postings of a Troubled Mind"

Whenever something like this occurs, miserable interactions with women are a culprit, if not the biggest one. What cannot be stressed enough is the importance of consistence sex and companionship that a man needs to keep his sanity. Its no joke. Its life and death. We are seeing examples of it over and over again. Men need sex, men need women that truly care about them as a person. One might jump to say, "But all people want that, including women!" Well, women are not the ones that experience loneliness the way men do.

Here's a question everyone must ask themselves: If Loughner had a girlfriend that loved and cared about him, would this tragedy have happened? No one can say for sure. It is a question for critical thought.

Women and Eugenics

Scenario: After being rejected by a woman, you discover that she also informed her friends of the debacle. Now not only has she rejected your advances, but she also ruined your chances with several other women. What is this inclination that women have and where does it come from? I am here with an answer: Eugenics

The image that you see to the left includes tools that have further enabled most women to be quasi-eugenicists. They can now line up all their prospects conveniently on a screen and carefully select what genes they want to allow to propagate. Its almost like shopping in the cereal isle for women. The over-abundance of options that even average plain-janes posses is remarkable, and in combination with social media, they can all use their sexual prowess to their advantage like never before. Make no mistake about it, social media has benefited women exclusively and has almost done as much harm to men that feminism has.

The Theory of Modern Female Quasi-Eugenicists

I am not saying that women are walking around reading your genetic code as a scientist would. That's not what I mean by quasi-eugenics. Your genes are expressed through your physical traits. Gene expression. Also known as phenotypes. Its eugenics on a small-scale; women control who gets laid and how, therefore they control propagation. If they reject you, they are rejecting your genes. When they go back to their social cliques and inform other females of how you were rejected and humiliated, she is sub-communicating that your genes are undesirable, and all the women should reject your genes from passing on as well. Now, she has successfully ended the possibility of your genes propagating with several more women in addition to herself.

Hence my term, quasi-eugenics.

In the following video, Mystery explains how being a victim of quasi-eugenics in tribal times directly relates to fearing the approach of women today:




But there is something else....something, elusive. The "IT" factor that was discussed in a previous thread. I think that women have some sort of intuition or animal-like quality that turns them on to the "IT" factor.

This is why many men can't understand why they are single and it seems to defy logic. Isn't it curious how the dating game has always been sort of an inside joke? In other words, dating has always been a sort of "if you have to ask, you aren't getting any" type deals. Those who have it have it, and they can't even successfully explain it to someone who does not. Kind of like how women always seem to give bad dating advice, as if they want you to fail.

The "IT" factor is something that has yet to be discovered that some lack, and women know it. Most guys have it, but some don't. Maybe its facial symmetry. Most likely, it is the gene that women can sense.

I mean, there are certainly things that can transcend all else, such as wealth and riches. Especially in America. I'm not stupid enough to suggest that even being rich wouldn't help lonely men. It would. My theory by and large has to do with normal people who exist outside of the top 2% of American society. Other guys try to compensate in other ways, such as getting super-jacked, getting nice tats, etc.



Let me give you an example of why none of this stuff even matters anyway: George Sodini

* He was worth $250,000. That is financial security
* He had a nice house, car, and stable job.
* He was built. He worked out at LA Fitness Gym.
* He went to PUA conventions


As you can see, he did everything that most people would jump to suggest for you to do if you complain about not getting women. People will say,

"you need to make at least decent money"
"you need a career and goals"
"you need to workout and become healthy and attractive"
"you need to learn how to talk to women. "

George Sodini did all of this and some. He went right down the checklist of requirements that women have. Yet, it was all in vein. Why?

Quasi-eugenics. His genes simply were not desirable, for no discernible reason. Women severed his genes off from society; forced him into celibacy and loneliness. The female eugenicists destroyed Sodini, so he in turn took the lives of 3 of them. I'm not condoning anything, but you see my point.

The difference between this and regular sexual selection

The abundance of selection that these women have, specifically in Western countries.

Women may be this way partly by nature. But guess what: in the 50's, they could most certainly NOT exhibit quasi-eugenic behavior, because society put barriers in place that controlled their sexuality. Now, those barriers don't exist and women have all the free reign in sexual selection that they want. Also not all women can have the power the be quasi-eugenicists, but most do. As long as she is a 6, she is a god among insects and will enjoy endless options until she hits age 53. 5's as well. Women below this still have options but its not as much and not guaranteed

Michael Savage talked about this. He said that shame is a good thing. When you do bad in school, you should feel ashamed. When women act promiscuous, they SHOULD be shamed by society and scorned. Unfortunately that does not exist in the West anymore. To many weak-minded men allowed this to happen.

I must point out however that I think most women in the dating game fall within the 6-10 range. Beauty seems to be common; Mystery (a famous pick-up artist) said this himself. I can vouch. On my college campus I can honestly say that ugly undesirable women are rare; I find myself attracted to the majority of them. All it takes is the right outfit and makeup, and women can all look above average and be selective breeders. So therefore, the vast majority of women are quasi-eugenicists and have the power to do it to men.

Another example is the Middle East...the men there do not allow their women to be eugenicists and control what genes get passed on. The nice guys in the middle east get their genes propagated, as well as most men there in general, good-looking or bad. Why, social barriers (i.e public shame, beatings. harsh but its necessary)

In China however, the government has become the eugenicist. The gender imbalance there was deliberately done by the communist regime. Men there are screwed to hell and they report very low sexual partners on average...sad.

All women are quasi-eugenicists by nature and as long as they have complete sexual freedom with no barriers, nice guy genes will continue to be weeded out of existence. This is why you see more and more psychopaths and douchebags in bars and clubs hording all of the women. Women chose the fathers of these men for that very reason, make no mistake about it.

Possible Solution: Get the Hell Out of This Country

So, I've been pondering about my location lately. I pretty much am fed up with America. Where should I go? Better yet, where can I go? Is it even feasible, given my particular situation, to move out of the country for good?

I sure as hell hope so.

The first thing on the list of things to remember would be the language barrier. I could encounter difficulties if I do not understand what anyone or anything says; moreover, I certainly would not be able to assimilate into the culture. That is what I ultimately want to do, move somewhere else, and completely convert to their way of life. This includes learning their language. English-speaking countries will be my first choice, but I will not rule out learning another language if the situation is nice enough

Here are a few places I've given serious thought to:

New Zealand




I've heard great things about this place. Perhaps...







Canada (Alberta)






I don't know. Saskatchewan, Quebec, Nova Scotia? I like the idea of Canada because I've been there and I have family that are citizens there. From what I hear, people are much friendlier in Canada. Everything I hear about the place is good.

However, people seem to dislike Toronto, so I'll stay away from there. The things I hear about Toronto are that it is even more expensive than New York, the women are notorious for being stuck-up, flaky, and unfriendly, and people are in general submersed in their own lives and not willing to make friends.

That's a huge factor for me. I have to be able to have a successful life amongst others, and Toronto's qualities seems similar to the Seattle Freeze in many ways.


For instance, check out the city-data forum for Toronto:
Toronto Forum on Difficulties in the Social Scene


Nonetheless, I will strongly consider everywhere else Canada.




Germany




The women are some of the most beautiful in the world. Seems like a cool place. I'd have to learn German, but I think I could do it. Who knows?





The Philippines





The demographics of men to women favors me here. They are all bilingual, so I wouldn't need to learn Philippine. I also hear this place is very friendly. Am I scared of 3rd world countries? Nope. I live in a terrible city as it is.



The U.K.











I once read somewhere that there is no paradise. Every place has its ups and downs, its share of problems. I recognize this reality and fully accept it. However, I am 90% positive that the U.S is not the place for me. One day, I hope to get away to one of the above mentioned places. I hope to thrive somewhere else, and just be happy.

What hinders me? Well, lets see. I'm not done with school, I will have a ton of loans to pay off when I graduate, and then I would have to find a job in the new place that could A) pay the loans and B) still leave me with enough to live off of.

Other than that, there's nothing stopping me. We'll see what happens. I need to get skills that I can market anywhere.

Strange, Startling Dream

Have you ever dreamed of a family member coming close to death? That's what I just had. It took me by complete surprise.

Today, I did what I usually do: School, then lunch, then home. I was depressed as I have been for months now. I was thinking about the past and how I wish I could change it, and about my current problems. I do this everyday. Then when I got home, I was mad at myself for missing opportunities to further connect with people on campus. I really should have stayed on campus instead of commuting.

So anyway, I get home, play some Xbox, then take a nap. 9/10 I don't get or remember my dreams. But this time, I dreamed about a certain family member coming close to death. The reason why this struck such a nerve and startled me so much, is because I have yet to have had to deal with the passing of someone close to me. All the deaths in my family have not been devastating, as I was not that close to those people.

I remember the dream in bits and pieces...I drove to some sort of amusement center. A Dave and Busters type place. (This reminds me of that movie Inception. DeCaprio explains in the movie that we do not remember the beginning of dreams usually, just the middle. He explained some other stuff that I can't recall that was related to this)




My close(debatable if this is true anymore) family member was there. As I was walking around, I saw this family member in line for something. Let's call the family member X. X had a pale skin tone. At first, I started to wonder why my skin wasn't pale, or if it was going to be pale, or if it now was.

Then, I had the horrible epiphany that X was about to die soon. Rather it was cancer or just old age, their time was coming to an end. X started talking to me in a way that was profoundly sad.

Then, at home, I broke down in tears while sitting next to X. I was about to tell X how sorry I was for everything I had done, and I was about to tell X the reasons why I was this way. Then I realized that I was only doing this because X was about to die...and I was ashamed. Just as I was about to tell X how sorry I was, I woke up from the dream. My heart was racing.

2 minutes later, X came into my room and asked if I could drive them to pick up their car. I said OK and was ready to go in 30 seconds. I dress fast. I'm not like other family member that takes 20 minutes to get ready to go anywhere. So, on the drive to the car shop, I asked X what they thought about my "check engine" light being on. X said it could be many things. Then, X said to keep checking the engine and it's many parts. X said that its like a person; I knew it's heartbeat more than anyone else, because it was my car. X said that just like observing a person, I should be able to tell if it was having trouble starting, trouble getting going, if it was near the end.

I know this is all coincidence. Nothing in my life has given me ample reason to believe in anything beyond the harsh realities of the world.

Game Changers

Game Changer That Will Favor Men

What we have in the United States is a full blown matriarchy. In the courtship process, women have all of the power and control. The male must do all of the work, from initiating to being the breadwinner. I've outlined this thoroughly in previous posts. See here


What can a guy do? Women are on such a high pedestal that even average to ugly ones have a multitude of options by default, while it is very easy for an average guy to have nothing at all. The simplest way of putting it is like this: a guy who is a 7 and a woman who is a 7 are not equal in their sexual-market value. The woman will certainly have more options than the guy. There will be flirtatious posts on her facebook wall everyday by random guys just waiting for their chance. She, of course, soaks in all the attention and will certainly continue to chase the alpha male (think "the situation" from Jersey Shore) that already HAS women chasing him. Illogical. She will be approached when she goes to the store, campus, clubs with her friends, bars, wherever. This is an advantage that cannot be stressed enough. The male is expected to have the burden of making the first move, while the woman can sit back and be picky, picky, picky, picky. If the guy says one wrong thing he's out the door. If he calls to early, he's a creep. If he calls to late, well, she's already forgotten him because she has so many options that his value is nothing. This is the plight of men.

Part of it is feminism, but an even larger part is obesity (see here ) and demographics; there are many more single men than there are single women in the age categories that are relevant.

1). The first is legislative: Fully Legalized Prostitution. I'm talking Keynesianism for safety/health (STD checks, etc), advertisements on television, and online ordering of hookers. Private businesses could thrive in this new (legal) market.

This will immediately remove all men from the dating pool that are only looking for sex. This in and of itself will decrease the sexual power of women everywhere 10 fold. All of a sudden, you will see less bitchiness less demanding, less superficiality, and less slutiness. American women will no longer be able to get away with these things because they would no longer hold the ultimate trump card over men: vagina. If a guy could buy it at a decent rate, without fear of a sting operation or disease, why go out and try to game/spend money on some undeserved woman?

The only way this can be achieved is politically of course. The Mens Movement needs electable public figures that will fight tooth and nail to get prostitution decriminalized in their respective locales. The entire movement would have to come together...all the PUA's, TFL, DJ's, Nice-guy's, Spearheads, even Incels. If they all were to band together and find leaders to put in public office, then that would be a start.

2) Sex Robots -

CNET Sex Robot Article

As you can read from the article above, sex-bots are becoming a reality.

Once Japan creates and refines a life-like robot that has realistic female body parts and can possibly cook/clean the house, feminism will begin to crumble. It doesn't take much thought to understand why having a sex robot could literally replace women. These robots, however, would certainly have to be made affordable. When the first wave of them hits the market, they will surely have extremely high price tags. Fortunately, as demand grows and technology continues to advance, the sex machines will slowly become affordable and pretty soon, these bots will be in almost every household. Wives will be forced to either give her man more pleasure or accept him getting it from his new robotic girlfriend. Of course, at first, there will be a bit of a stigma against owning one of these machines. This shaming language, which will undoubtedly include "loser", "virgin", "creep", etc, will come mostly from women that know that their sexual power over men is coming to an end.

Just check out the comments from that article. Here are a few:


"And, yes, I believe real people (male and female) are to blame for the dolls. Everyone just cares about themselves these days and this product caters to that. Imagine having your needs met anytime you want without having to consider someone else's?"

-celticbrewer

This is simply judgmental. So guys are only allowed the options of either catering to self-entitled princesses or just becoming hermits? Who is this guy to be against such a thing that will not effect his life?


"This is just wrong and creepy on many levels."

-gameking23

Shaming language. Judgments, judgments, judgments. I suppose everyone is perfect except this guy, right?


"It's depressing that people have sunk to this level. What kind of person would let a robot replace a person?"

-NerdusMaximus

I'm beginning to detect a pattern here... Everyone seems to have an idea in their heads of how others should act, and if you dare deviate from what societies deems as normal, you shall be shamed and insulted. That's how it works, folks.



3) Male Birth Control - This won't have as much of an effect as the previous 2 game changers, but it will certainly work in men's favor. The ability to screw raw-dog without fear of impregnating the sperm recipient will revolutionize sexual control for men, while lowering the risk of paying her for 18+ years. Women, for whatever reason, seem to have trouble taking their birth control on schedule. They tend to "forget", or swear that it didn't work once they get pregnant. We know these are lies and that girls know they can financially entrap a man by getting pregnant, hence the reason they purposefully do away with their pills from time to time.

What You Should Listen To...Because I Do!

Music taste, for me, has changed drastically over the years. When I was younger, I would listen to nothing but repulsive rap music while playing video games...ah, those were the days. You could find me with my Dell Pocket DJ in my ears playing Star Wars: Jedi Outcast 2, Star Wars: Jedi Academy, NBA Live games, Madden NFL, and of course, Halo 2. I probably played Halo 2 more than any one guy should :) When I went through my World of Warcraft phase, I listened to standup comedy. Mostly George Carlin on youtube.

Now I listen to an entirely different array of music. Below is what is in my Zune (the speakers in my Jeep are screwed up, plus the CD player does not work anymore) everyday while I drive to college campus, work, or to get black coffee from Dunkin Donuts.

Below each Band are suggested songs. You can't go wrong with them.


Radiohead



I listen to these guys the most. Thom Yorke has produced some amazing stuff. Here's what I recommend starting out:

"Street Spirit [Fade Out]"
"Creep"
"Pyramid Song"
"High and Dry"
"Karma Police"


Boards of Canada



Ambient/electronic music is now my new favorite genre, mainly because it is so relaxing. Stress and depression can creep up easily these days, and there's nothing that can calm the soul than BOC. Here are tracks that I recommend from this group:

"Dayvan Cowboy"
"Music is Math"


The Notwist



My favorite band, period. These guys produce the ultimate music in my opinion. They are a German Indie Rock band. Here are some must listens:

"Pick Up The Phone"
"Consequence"
"One With The Freaks"
"Pilot"
"Gloomy Planets"
"On Planet Off"


The Seatbelts



I discovered the Seatbelts through my favorite anime, Cowboy Bebop. They produce futuristic jazz. Its great to listen to and works well within the episodes of the show. They have a ton of CD's out. Here are a few good songs:

"Piano Black"
"Memory"
"Is it Real"
"Adieu"
"7 Minutes"
"Clutch"
"Rain"


Nujabes



The guy who produced these tracks has passed away, unfortunately. He was in a car crash in China a few years ago. Here are some great tracks for listening:

"Horizon"
"Kunomi"
"Arubian Dance"
"World's End Raphsody"
"Beyond"
"Transcendence"


The Veils



Just discovered these guys while surfing Expat blogs. An expat is basically someone who leaves their native country in search of a better life elsewhere. Anyway, the blog was authored by some woman living in New Zealand. She posted a video that she thought was funny that wasa an edited movie trailer that used clips from Seinfeld. Yea, its hard to explain. Here's what I'm talking about:



That first song is what hooked me. Here are some tracks for listening for The Veils

"Talk Down The Girl"
"Leavers Dance"
"Vicious Traditions"


MCR




Yea, I like them. And I'm way late.

"You Know What They Do TO Guys Like Us In Prison"
"Ghost of You"
"Cemetery Drive"
"The Jetset Life Is Gonna Kill You"


Linkin Park



Now these guys are PERFECT for listening to while working out. The following are guaranteed motivators:

"Crawling"
"New Divide"
"Somewhere I Belong"
"In The End"


Local H



"Hand To Mouth"
"Bound To The Floor"

Here are honorable mentions that I also like (just songs):

Eminem- "Superman"
Lil Wayne- "Shoot Me Down"
Korn- "Make it Go Away"
NERD- "Breakout"
Muse- "Time Is Running Out"

So, more or less, that is my music taste.